4.2 Review

Idiopathic megalencephaly-possible cause and treatment opportunities: From patient to lab

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 438-445

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.11.008

Keywords

Megalencephaly; Epilepsy; Episodic ataxia; Neurogenes; Apoptosis; Animal model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Megalencephaly means an increased size or weight of a generally well-formed brain. It is a feature of a heterogeneous group of mostly familial human disorders with prenatal or early childhood onset. Seizures, motor deficits, mental retardation or milder cognitive impairment are sometimes present. This review discusses idiopathic megalencephalies with regard to possible etiology and treatment opportunities. Idiopathic megalencephalies with neurological deficits as well as unilateral megalencephaly are hypothesized to be caused by disturbances of proliferation, survival or migration of neurons in the brain. The current knowledge of postnatal and adult generation of neurons and survival of adult-borne neurons is reviewed. We show an example of how a genetic potassium channel dysfunction causes not only temporal lobe epilepsy, but also postnatal progressive megalencephaly in a mouse model. We also summarize novel data on neuro-protective effects of the antiepileptic drug carbamazepine in the treatment of brain overgrowth. Findings propose that potassium ion channelopathy may underlie disease for a group of infants or young children displaying idiopathic megalencephaly and early onset epilepsy or episodic ataxia type 1. Carbamazepine's remarkable protective effects on the neuronal plasticity in the hyperexcitable state should be further studied, and maybe this drug should be considered more in treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy and megalencephaly. (C) 2008 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available