4.5 Article

Cu-Catalyzed Enantioselective 1,4-Additions of Aryl-Grignard Reagents to Cyclohexenone in the Presence of TADDOL-Derived Phosphane-Phosphite Ligands

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 2012, Issue 6, Pages 1179-1185

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201101258

Keywords

Asymmetric catalysis; C-C bond formation; Conjugate addition; Copper; P ligands

Funding

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asymmetric conjugate additions (1,4-additions) of aryl-Grignard reagents to cyclohex-2-enone, currently a more or less unsolved challenge, were investigated. For this purpose, a small library of phenol-derived chiral phosphane-phosphite ligands containing TADDOL- or BINOL-based phosphite moieties was evaluated. These ligands are easily prepared by a short modular scheme previously developed in this laboratory. Two particularly powerful ligands (4a and 4b, both TADDOL-derived and each possessing a bulky tert-butyl substituent ortho to the phosphite group) were identified. Conditions were optimized with use of the addition of (4-methoxyphenyl)magnesium bromide to cyclohexenone as a standard reaction system. Under optimized conditions [CuBr.SMe2 (4 mol-%), ligand 4a (6 mol-%), 2-methyl-THF, 78 degrees C, slow addition of Grignard reagent] the 1,4-product was obtained with high enantioselectivity (up to 95?% ee) and good regioselectivity (r.r. = 90:10). The scope of the method was probed with different aryl-Grignard reagents. It was found that reagents with electron-donating substituents in meta- or para-positions performed particularly well, whereas the presence of F or CF3 substituents led to decreased ee values. Only ortho-substituted aryl-Grignard reagents did not give rise to useful results. A series of phosphane-phosphite ligands were also tested in the Rh-catalyzed 1,4-addition of phenylboronic acid to cyclohexenone, but enantioselectivities did not exceed 70?% ee in this case.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available