4.6 Article

Postoperative pyoderma gangrenosum (PG): The Mayo Clinic experience of 20 years from 1994 through 2014

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages 615-622

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.054

Keywords

breast; Cullen gangrene; dehiscence; dermatitis ulcerosa; neutrophilic dermatosis; postoperative; postsurgical; pyoderma gangrenosum; wound infection

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Postoperative pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by the development of PG-type lesions within surgical sites. Objective: We sought to characterize postoperative PG as a distinct subtype of PG for earlier recognition and prevention of improper therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with nonperistomal postoperative PG at Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2014. Results: Eighteen patients had postoperative PG with an average age of 58 years. Fifteen (83%) were female. Among patients with postoperative PG, 4 (22%) had an associated systemic disease traditionally associated with PG. Sites of postoperative PG included 7 breast (38%), 7 abdomen (38%), 1 back, 1 shoulder, 1 ankle, and 1 scrotum, with breast reconstruction being the most common surgery. The average time to symptoms was 11 days. No patients had a fever. Eight (44%) had documented anemia and 5 (27%) had leukocytosis. Antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids were initiated in 10 (56%) and 14 (83%), respectively. Debridement was done in 11 (61%) patients. Limitations: Small sample size and retrospective study are limitations. Conclusion: Postoperative PG is a rare surgical complication with predilection for the breast and abdomen of females and has less association with systemic disease than idiopathic PG. Early recognition may prevent unnecessary debridements and morbidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available