4.1 Article

Impact of dental caries on quality of life among preschool children: emphasis on the type of tooth and stages of progression

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 88-95

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12166

Keywords

dental caries; preschool children; quality of life

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology
  3. State of Minas Gerais Research Foundation (FAPEMIG), Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the impact of dental caries on the quality of life of preschool children and their parents/caretakers, with an emphasis on the type of tooth and stage of progression. A randomly selected sample of preschool children, 3-5yrs of age, underwent an oral examination for the assessment of dental caries using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) criteria. Parents/caretakers answered two questionnaires, one on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of the child [the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS)], and the other on the socio-economic characteristics of the family. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Poisson regression. A total of 451 preschool children participated in the study. The majority of carious lesions exhibited severe decay (60.6%) and were found in both anterior (incisors/canines) and posterior (molars) teeth. The final Poisson model revealednegative impacts on quality of lifefrom more advanced stages of dental caries, both in incisors/canines and molars. Child's age and household income were also associated with impact on quality of life.Carious lesions in more advanced stages of progression in anterior and posterior teeth were associated with a negative impact on the quality of life of preschool children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available