4.1 Article

Malocclusion and quality of life in Brazilian preschoolers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 223-229

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12130

Keywords

preschool child; quality of life; malocclusion

Funding

  1. State University of Paraiba
  2. Brazilian Coordination of Higher Education, Ministry of Education (CAPES)
  3. Research Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ), Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of malocclusion on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among preschool children and their families. This study involved 732 preschoolers. Parents/caregivers filled out the Brazilian version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (B-ECOHIS) and a questionnaire addressing sociodemographic data. Overbite, overjet, and crossbite were recorded during the clinical examination. Bivariate and multiple Poisson regression analyses were performed and prevalence ratio (PR) were calculated (alpha=5%). The prevalence of negative impact from malocclusion on OHRQoL was 27.6% among the children and 22.3% among the families. Mother's schooling (PR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.10-1.70), parent's/caregiver's assessment of child's oral health (PR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.60-2.58), history of toothache (PR=3.84; 95% CI: 2.34-6.30), and visits to the dentist (PR=0.59; 95% CI: 0.37-0.94) remained significantly associated with OHRQoL in the final model for the children, whereas parent's/caregiver's assessment of child's oral health (PR=2.32; 95% CI: 1.71-3.14) and history of toothache (PR=2.28; 95% CI: 1.69-3.09) remained significantly associated with OHRQoL for the families. Malocclusion was not associated with a negative impact on OHRQoL. In contrast, parents'/caregivers' perceptions regarding the oral health of their children and a history of toothache were predictors of a negative impact on the OHRQoL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available