4.1 Article

Detection and quantification of monomers in unstimulated whole saliva after treatment with resin-based composite fillings in vivo

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 89-95

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00897.x

Keywords

chromatography; eluates; monomers; resin-based composites; saliva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resin-based dental restorative materials contain allergenic methacrylate monomers, which may be released into saliva after restorative treatment. Monomers from resin-based composite materials have been demonstrated in saliva in vitro; however, studies analyzing saliva after restorative therapy are scarce. The aim of this study was to quantify methacrylate monomers in saliva after treatment with a resin-based composite filling material. Saliva was collected from 10 patients at four start points before treatment, and 10 min, 24 h, and 7 d after treatment - and analysed by combined chromatography/mass spectrometry. The monomers bisphenol-A diglycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) were detected and quantified in the samples collected shortly (10 min) after treatment. The amounts detected ranged from 0.028 to 9.65 mu g ml(-1) for Bis-GMA, from 0.015 to 0.19 mu g ml(-1) for HEMA, and from 0.004 to 1.2 mu g ml(-1) for UDMA. Triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) was detected in four of the samples. Ethoxylated bisphenol-A dimethacrylate (Bis-EMA) was not detected. Monomers were not detected in saliva samples collected before treatment, or 24 h or 7 d after treatment, with the exception of one sample, 24 h after treatment, in which HEMA was detected. In conclusion, monomers from the investigated resin-based composite and adhesive system were present in saliva shortly after treatment. One week after treatment, no monomers could be detected in patients' saliva samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available