4.1 Article

Down-regulation of expression of osteoblast and osteocyte markers in periodontal tissues associated with the spontaneous alveolar bone loss of interleukin-10 knockout mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 19-28

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00706.x

Keywords

alveolar bone loss; bone formation; bone resorption; cytokines; knockout mice

Funding

  1. FAPESP
  2. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to unravel the mechanisms by which interleukin (IL)-10, a potent pleiotropic cytokine, modulates alveolar bone homeostasis in C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) and IL-10 knockout (IL-10 KO) mice, evaluated at 8, 24, and 48 wk of age. Interleukin-10 KO mice presented significant alveolar bone loss when compared with WT mice, and this was not associated with changes in leukocyte counts or bacterial load. The levels of expression of messenger RNA (mRNA) for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-1 beta, IL-6, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) were similar between both strains, whereas a significant decrease of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1) mRNA expression was found at 48 wk in IL-10 KO mice. The osteoblast markers core binding factor alpha1 (CBFA1) and type I collagen (COL-I) were expressed at similar levels in both strains, whereas the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OCN), and those of the osteocyte markers phosphate-regulating gene endopeptidases (PHEX) and dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) were significantly lower in IL-10 KO mice. Our results demonstrate that the alveolar bone loss in the absence of IL-10 was associated with a reduced expression of osteoblast and osteocyte markers, an effect independent of microbial, inflammatory or bone-resorptive pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available