4.7 Review

Multi-start methods for combinatorial optimization

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 226, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.012

Keywords

Metaheuristics; Multi-start methods; Adaptive memory programming; GRASP

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain [TIN2009-07516, TIN2012-35632]
  2. CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico of Brazil [308687/2010-8, 483243/2010-8]
  3. FAPERJ, Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [E-26/110.552/2010, E-26/102.954/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-start methods strategically sample the solution space of an optimization problem. The most successful of these methods have two phases that are alternated for a certain number of global iterations. The first phase generates a solution and the second seeks to improve the outcome. Each global iteration produces a solution that is typically a local optimum, and the best overall solution is the output of the algorithm. The interaction between the two phases creates a balance between search diversification (structural variation) and search intensification (improvement), to yield an effective means for generating high-quality solutions. This survey briefly sketches historical developments that have motivated the field, and then focuses on modern contributions that define the current state-of-the-art. We consider two categories of multi-start methods: memory-based and memoryless procedures. The former are based on identifying and recording specific types of information (attributes) to exploit in future constructions. The latter are based on order statistics of sampling and generate unconnected solutions. An interplay between the features of these two categories provides an inviting area for future exploration. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available