4.7 Article

A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 218, Issue 3, Pages 747-754

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.042

Keywords

Goal programming model; Consistency; Group decision-making; Incomplete interval multiplicative preference relation; IWGA operator

Funding

  1. National Science Fund of China [70825005]
  2. GDUPS
  3. Guangxi Natural Science Fund [0991029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In decision making problems, there may be the cases where the decision makers express their judgements by using preference relations with incomplete information. Then one of the key issues is how to estimate the missing preference values. In this paper, we introduce an incomplete interval multiplicative preference relation and give the definitions of consistent and acceptable incomplete ones, respectively. Based on the consistency property of interval multiplicative preference relations, a goal programming model is proposed to complement the acceptable incomplete one. A new algorithm of obtaining the priority vector from incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations is given. The goal programming model is further applied to group decision-making (GDM) where the experts evaluate their preferences as acceptable incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations. An interval weighted geometric averaging (IWGA) operator is proposed to aggregate individual preference relations into a social one. Furthermore, the social interval multiplicative preference relation owns acceptable consistency when every individual one is acceptably consistent. Two numerical examples are carried out to show the efficiency of the proposed goal programming model and the algorithms. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available