4.7 Review

Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 213, Issue 1, Pages 1-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018

Keywords

Maintenance; Remaining useful life; Brown motion; Stochastic filtering; Proportional hazards model; Markov

Funding

  1. EPSRC [GR\M96582]
  2. national 973 project [2010CB731800, 2009CB32602]
  3. NSFC [71071097, 60721003, 60736026]
  4. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [61025014]
  5. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU8/CRF/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remaining useful life (RUL) is the useful life left on an asset at a particular time of operation. Its estimation is central to condition based maintenance and prognostics and health management. RUL is typically random and unknown, and as such it must be estimated from available sources of information such as the information obtained in condition and health monitoring. The research on how to best estimate the RUL has gained popularity recently due to the rapid advances in condition and health monitoring techniques. However, due to its complicated relationship with observable health information, there is no such best approach which can be used universally to achieve the best estimate. As such this paper reviews the recent modeling developments for estimating the RUL. The review is centred on statistical data driven approaches which rely only on available past observed data and statistical models. The approaches are classified into two broad types of models, that is, models that rely on directly observed state information of the asset, and those do not. We systematically review the models and approaches reported in the literature and finally highlight future research challenges. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available