4.7 Article

Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 792-798

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Measuring efficiency; Tobit; Least squares; Fractional data

Funding

  1. Flinders Business School
  2. Missy Muggles and Coco Plus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper examines second stage DEA efficiency analyses, within the context of a censoring data generating process (DGP) and a fractional data DGP, when efficiency scores are treated as descriptive measures of the relative performance of units in the sample. It is argued that the efficiency scores are not generated by a censoring process but are fractional data. Tobit estimation in this situation is inappropriate. In contrast, ordinary least squares is a consistent estimator, and, if White's [White, H., 1980. A heteroskedastic-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817-838] heteroskedastic-consistent standard errors are calculated, large sample tests can be performed which are robust to heteroskedasticity and the distribution of the disturbances. For a more refined analysis Papke and Wooldridge's [Papke, L.E., Wooldridge, J.M., 1996. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (6), 619-632] method has some advantages, but is more complex and requires special programming. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available