4.7 Article

Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multicriteria decision making

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 194, Issue 2, Pages 464-473

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.029

Keywords

Fuzzy multicriteria decision making; Group decisions; Comparative judgement; Absolute judgement; TOPSIS

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC95-2811-H-006-001]
  2. National Cheng Kung University [OUA 95-21-T-6-151]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach for evaluating decision alternatives involving subjective judgements made by a group of decision makers. A pairwise comparison process is used to help individual decision makers make comparative judgements, and a linguistic rating method is used for making absolute judgements. A hierarchical weighting method is developed to assess the weights of a large number of evaluation criteria by pairwise comparisons. To reflect the inherent imprecision of subjective judgements, individual assessments are aggregated as a group assessment using triangular fuzzy numbers. To obtain a cardinal preference value for each decision alternative, a new fuzzy MCDM algorithm is developed by extending the concept of the degree of optimality to incorporate criteria weights in the distance measurement. An empirical study of aircraft selection is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available