4.7 Article

Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 186, Issue 2, Pages 720-734

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.012

Keywords

incremental analysis; multi-criteria analysis; benefit-cost ratio; TOPSIS; engineering economy; ratio scale; preference aggregation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to exploit incremental analysis or marginal analysis to overcome the drawbacks of ratio scales utilized in various multi-criteria or multi-attribute decision making (MCDM/MADM.) techniques. In the proposed 11-step procedure, multiple criteria of alternatives are first reorganized as two categories - benefits and costs - and decision information will be manipulated separately. The performances of alternatives are then evaluated on their incremental benefit-cost ratio, and the rank can be obtained by applying the group TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) model (Shih et al., 2007). Two representations of cost, i.e., a cost index and utility index, are proposed in the model to better-fit real-world situations. In addition, some considerations on costs and input-output relations are also discussed in order to understand the essentials of incremental analysis. In the final part, a case of robot selection demonstrates the suggested model to be both robust and efficient in a group decision-making environment. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available