4.5 Article

Perceived symptoms and the supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors six months to five years post-treatment period

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 3-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.10.005

Keywords

Symptoms; Unmet needs; Supportive care needs; Breast cancer survivors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study characterized the range and levels of perceived symptoms and unmet needs reported by breast cancer survivors in the half-year to five year post-treatment period, and determined whether the symptoms can be a predictor of unmet needs. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 150 breast cancer survivors (mean age: 55.1 +/- 8 years) at the halfyear to five year post-treatment period were enrolled for analysis. The measuring scales used included the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34). Results: 88% of the survivors reported having at least one symptom, while 51% reported at least one unmet need. Lack of energy was the most prevalent symptom (47%), followed by numbness/tingling in hands/feet (41%). Most of the survivors had unmet needs in the Health care system/Information domain (37% reported at least one unmet need for help), followed by Psychological needs (29%). The mean scores for the SCNS-SF34 domains, except for sexuality, were significantly higher in the high-symptom group (mean 17.6-32.2) compared with the low-symptom group (mean 3.5-22.3) (p < 0.01). Regression of the SCNS-SF34 domain scores against the MSAS scores revealed an increase in the explained variance of from 14% to 54%. Conclusion: Our results suggest that breast cancer survivors continue to experience a multitude of symptoms, and the burden of symptoms may be associated with unmet needs across a range of domains. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available