4.5 Article

A patient education program is effective in reducing cancer-related fatigue: A multi-centre randomised two-group waiting-list controlled intervention trial

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 204-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.07.002

Keywords

Cancer-related fatigue; Patient education; Nonpharmacologic interventions

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ: O1GT0605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate a patient education program that aims at reducing perceived fatigue in cancer survivors. Methods: In ten German centres, 261 patients with cancer-related fatigue were randomly assigned to a patient education program consisting of 6 sessions a 90 min or standard care. The primary outcome measure was cancer-related fatigue. Data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures. Results: Patients in the intervention group showed statistically significant reduction in cancer-related fatigue (F = 76.510, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.248). Secondary outcomes also showed significant improvements in all measures, including quality of life (F = 29.607, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.113), general self-efficacy (F = 27.680, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.107), exercise self-efficacy (F = 49.230, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.175), physical activity (F = 8.036, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.033), anxiety (F = 33.194, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.125), depression (F = 24.604, p < 0.001, eta(2) = 0.096), and fatigue knowledge (F = 55.157, p <0.001, eta(2) = 0.192). Conclusion: The program was effective in reducing perceived fatigue as well as further outcomes. Practice implications: This newly developed education program has the potential to fill a gap in the care of cancer survivors. The program needs further evaluation in other countries employing a control group of patients receiving equal time and attention as the intervention group. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available