4.3 Article

Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia and neonatal morbidity: a case-control study

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.012

Keywords

Preeclampsia; VEGF; PlGF; sFlt-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the association of preeclampsia with angiogenic imbalance, and the correlation of levels of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors to complications in mother and fetus. Study design: Serum samples were obtained from 40 women with established preeclampsia (study group) and from 40 normotensive women (control group). Epidemiological characteristics of the two groups were analyzed. The levels of the angiogenic (VEGF and PlGF) and anti-angiogenic (sFlt-1) factors of the two study groups were determined in serum using ELISA. Neonatal adverse outcomes (late preterm, early term, low birth weight (LBW), very LBW (VLBW), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission) between the groups of the study were analyzed, as well as the association between the biomarkers of the study and neonatal adverse outcomes of the preeclamptic group of patients. Results: sFlt-1 levels were significantly higher in the preeclamptic women compared to normotensive women (median (range): 21 297 (690-32 637) pg/ml vs. 846.45 (363-2867) pg/ml, respectively), whereas there was a significant decrease in the levels of VEGF (90(90-211) pg/ml vs. 90.55 (90-521) pg/ml, respectively), as well as in the levels of PIGF (13.62 (8-532) pg/ml vs. 239.86 (61-685) pg/ml, respectively). The increased serum values of the anti-angiogenic sFlt-1 were associated with increased rates of late preterm and early term births and VLBW. Conclusion: An imbalance between angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors exists in preeclampsia and is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available