4.3 Article

Myo-inositol metabolism in appropriately grown and growth-restricted fetuses: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.006

Keywords

Fetal growth restriction; Brain; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Action Medical Research
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Moonbeam Trust
  4. MRC [MC_U120088465, MR/K006355/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K006355/1, MC_U120088465] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Myo-inositol (Myo-ins) is a marker of neuroglial cells, being present in the astrocytes of brain tissue, but also functions as an osmolyte. Numbers of astrocytes are known to increase following injury to the brain. Growth-restricted fetuses are at increased risk of later neurodevelopmental impairments even in the absence of overt lesions and despite preserved/increased cerebral blood flow. This study aims to investigate brain Myo-ins metabolism in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and evidence of cerebral redistribution using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at a short echo time. Study design: Biometry and Doppler assessment of blood flow was assessed using ultrasound in 28 fetuses with IUGR and 47 appropriately grown control subjects. MRI was used to exclude overt brain injury. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fetal brain was then performed at an echo time of 42 ms to examine the Myo-ins:Choline (Cho), Myo-ins:Creatine (Cr) and Cho:Cr ratios. Results: No alterations in brain Myo-ins:Cho, Myo-ins:Cr or Cho:Cr ratios were detected between appropriately grown and growth restricted fetuses. Conclusions: IUGR is not associated with a measureable difference in brain myo-inositol ratios. This may be due to the protective effects of preserved cerebral blood flow in growth restriction and comparable astrocyte numbers when compared to controls. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available