4.3 Article

Adenomyosis has no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with endometriosis treated with long-term pituitary down-regulation before IVF/ICSI

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.047

Keywords

Adenomyosis; Endometriosis; GnRH-agonist; IVF; ICSI; Pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To establish the effect of adenomyosis on IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile patients with endometriosis who were pretreated with long-term (>= 3 months) GnRH-agonist prior to IVF/ICSI. Study design: Retrospective study in 74 infertile patients with surgically proven endometriosis who were treated with IVF/ICSI between January 2002 and March 2007. The diagnosis of adenomyosis was based on transvaginal ultrasound criteria. All patients were pretreated with long-term (>= 3 months) GnRH-agonist prior to IVF/ICSI. Results: 90.4% of the patients were diagnosed with endometriosis rASRM stages Adenomyosis was demonstrated in 27% of them and was predominantly located in the posterior wall of the uterus. The following IVF/ICSI outcomes were found: a mean duration of GnRH-agonist use prior to IVF/ICSI of 5.35 months (3-26); a mean dosage of FSH used of 208 IU (75-450); the mean number of oocytes retrieved was 8.73 (1-30); the mean number of embryos obtained was 3.86 (0-16): the mean number of embryos transferred was 1.6; a mean fertilization rate of 43.6%; a mean implantation rate of 26.3%; a mean miscarriage rate of 24.3%; and a clinical pregnancy rate (fetal heart activity on ultrasound beyond 12 weeks of gestation) of 31.7%. No significant differences were found for any of the IVF/ICSI outcomes between women with and without adenomyosis. Conclusions: Adenomyosis had no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile women with proven endometriosis who were pretreated with long-term GnRH-agonist. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available