4.5 Article

Consumption of a dark roast coffee decreases the level of spontaneous DNA strand breaks: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 149-156

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-014-0696-x

Keywords

Antioxidants; Coffee; Comet assay; Intervention study; DNA strand breaks

Funding

  1. Tchibo GmbH, Hamburg
  2. BMBF [0313843, 0315692]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Coffee consumption has been reported to decrease oxidative damage in peripheral white blood cells (WBC). However, effects on the level of spontaneous DNA strand breaks, a well established marker of health risk, have not been specifically reported yet. We analyzed the impact of consuming a dark roast coffee blend on the level of spontaneous DNA strand breaks. Methods Healthy men (n = 84) were randomized to consume daily for 4 weeks either 750 ml of fresh coffee brew or 750 ml of water, subsequent to a run in washout phase of 4 weeks. The study coffee was a blend providing high amounts of both caffeoylquinic acids (10.18 +/- 0.33 mg/g) and the roast product N-methylpyridinium (1.10 +/- 0.05 mg/g). Before and after the coffee/water consumption phase, spontaneous strand breaks were determined by comet assay. Results At baseline, both groups exhibited a similar level of spontaneous DNA strand breaks. In the intervention phase, spontaneous DNA strand breaks slightly increased in the control (water only) group whereas they significantly decreased in the coffee group, leading to a 27 % difference within both arms (p = 0.0002). Food frequency questionnaires indicated no differences in the overall diet between groups, and mean body weight during the intervention phases remained stable. The consumption of the study coffee substantially lowered the level of spontaneous DNA strand breaks in WBC. Conclusion We conclude that regular coffee consumption contributes to DNA integrity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available