Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Impact of the Definition of Peak Standardized Uptake Value on Quantification of Treatment Response
Matt Vanderhoek et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2012)
Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake Value
Martin A. Lodge et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2012)
Impact of [18F]FDG PET imaging parameters on automatic tumour delineation: need for improved tumour delineation methodology
Patsuree Cheebsumon et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING (2011)
Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tejpal Gupta et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING (2011)
Variations in PET/CT Methodology for Oncologic Imaging at US Academic Medical Centers: An Imaging Response Assessment Team Survey
Michael M. Graham et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2011)
Variations in Clinical PET/CT Operations: Results of an International Survey of Active PET/CT Users
Thomas Beyer et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2011)
SUVref: reducing reconstruction-dependent variation in PET SUV
Matthew D. Kelly et al.
EJNMMI RESEARCH (2011)
A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements
Michael C. Adams et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2010)
FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0
Ronald Boellaard et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING (2010)
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium
Frederic H. Fahey et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2010)
Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT
R. K. Doot et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2010)
Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy
Paul E. Kinahan et al.
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI (2010)
Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Rodney J. Hicks
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2009)
Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis
Ronald Boellaard
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2009)
Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy
Wolfgang A. Weber
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2009)
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
Richard L. Wahl et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2009)
18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer:: A systematic review
Yee C. Ung et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2007)
18FDG-Positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec®)
S Stroobants et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2003)
Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: Prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use
WA Weber et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2003)
Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development
R Frank et al.
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY (2003)