4.7 Article

[18F]fluorinated estradiol derivatives for oestrogen receptor imaging:: impact of substituents, formulation and specific activity on the biodistribution in breast tumour-bearing mice

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0745-x

Keywords

positron emission tomography; oestrogen receptors; breast cancer; F-18 16 alpha-fluoroestradiol; 4-fluoroestradiol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The biodistribution and tumour uptake of a series of 16 alpha-[F-18]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) derivatives was determined in oestrogen receptors-positive (ER+) tumour-bearing mice to assess the impact of substituents, formulation and specific activity on target tissue uptake. Methods MC4-L2 and MC7-L1 murine ER+ cells were inoculated in Balb/c mice. The animals were injected with various [F-18]FES derivatives substituted with 2- or 4-fluorine and/or an 11 beta-methoxy group. The radiopharmaceuticals were formulated in 10% ethanol/saline or 10% ethanol/lipid emulsion. The organs were counted, and radioactivity concentrations were expressed as the percentage of the injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g). To estimate the effect of specific activity on tumour uptake, the 4-fluoro-11 beta-methoxy-16 alpha-[F-18]-fluoroestradiol (4F-M[F-18]FES) was co-injected with different concentrations of non-radioactive estradiol to give an in vivo competitive inhibition curve. Results 4F-M[F-18]FES exhibited the highest average uterine uptake (%ID/g = 15.7 +/- 2.1). The highest uptake by the two mammary tumours was observed with [F-18]FES (%ID/g = 3.1 and 3.4 +/- 0.3) and 11 beta-methoxy-16 alpha[F-18]-fluoroestradiol (M-[F-18]FES) (%ID/g = 3.2 and 3.3 +/- 0.6), followed by 4F-M[F-18]FES (%ID/g = 2.5 and 2.3 +/- 0.3). The formulation had little influence on the biodistribution pattern. Co-injection with a total mass of estradiol > 10(-10) mol blocked 4F-M[F-18]FES tumour uptake. Conclusions All of the radiolabelled estradiol derivatives achieved significant target tissue uptake in vivo, both in ER+ tumours and the uterus. The formulation had little impact on the biodistribution of these compounds but some compounds (4F-M[F-18]FES, M-[F-18]FES and [F-18]FES) had more favourable target tissue uptake and target-to-background ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available