4.5 Article

Anticipation of meals during restricted feeding increases activity in the hypothalamus in rats

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages 1485-1491

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07880.x

Keywords

activity-based anorexia; food restriction; food-anticipatory activity; Fos; hyperactivity; hypothalamus

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, the Netherlands [90339175]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rats exposed to timed restricted meals develop anticipation of food. They increase their activity levels in the hours preceding food access; this has been described as food-anticipatory activity (FAA). In the present study, we show the involvement of regions of the hypothalamus [arcuate nucleus, dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) and lateral hypothalamus] in the early development of FAA in rats exposed to the activity-based anorexia (ABA) model. We thereby used two different paradigms, rats exposed to the ABA model (ABA-normal) and rats exposed to the same restraint in food access but on a random feeding schedule (ABA-random). The latter group of rats were not able to anticipate food. We found a strong correlation between the expression of food anticipation measured by running-wheel activity and Fos expression levels in the DMH of ABA-normal rats, whereas no correlation was found in ABA-random rats. In contrast, in the randomly fed ABA rats only, a strong negative correlation was found between the neuronal activity in the hypothalamic area and the percentage body weight loss. Interestingly, these results imply that anticipation of meals during food restriction more strongly affects activation in the hypothalamus than negative energy balance alone. We conclude that during the early stages of development of FAA, the DMH plays a role in anticipation of food during periods of negative energy balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available