4.5 Article

Surround suppression sharpens orientation tuning in the cat primary visual cortex

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 1035-1046

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06645.x

Keywords

area 17; classical receptive field; extraclassical receptive field; orientation-tuned surround suppression

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17022026, 18020018]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18020018, 17022026] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the primary visual cortex (V1), the response of a neuron to stimulation of its classical receptive field (CRF) is suppressed by concurrent stimulation of the extraclassical receptive field (ECRF), a phenomenon termed 'surround suppression'. It is also known that the orientation tuning of V1 neurons becomes sharper as the size of the stimulus increases beyond the CRF. However, there have been few quantitative investigations of the relationship between sharpening of orientation tuning and surround suppression. We examined this relationship in 73 V1 neurons recorded from anesthetized and paralysed cats using sinusoidal grating patches as stimuli. We found that sharpening of orientation tuning was significantly correlated with the strength of surround suppression for large stimuli that cover both CRF and ECRF. Furthermore, simulation analysis using a variety of tuning widths and most suppressive orientation of orientation-tuned surround suppression demonstrated that broadly orientation-tuned surround suppression sharpens orientation tuning for large gratings without shift in optimal orientation. Our findings suggest that one of the functional roles of surround suppression in V1 is enhancement of orientation discrimination for large and uniformly patterned objects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available