4.7 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid immunological biomarkers associated with axonal damage in multiple sclerosis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1169-1175

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.12579

Keywords

axonal damage; CSF; immunological biomarkers; multiple sclerosis; neurodegeneration; neurofilament light chain; oligoclonal IgM bands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purposeCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light protein (NFL) is a promising biomarker of axonal injury and neurodegeneration. Here CSF lymphocyte subpopulations and antibodies, potential players of neurodegeneration, are examined in relation to CSF NFL shedding in MS. MethodsCerebrospinal fluid NFL from 127 consecutive untreated MS patients was analysed. Samples from 37 age-matched patients with other central nervous system non-inflammatory neurological diseases (NIND) were also assessed. CD4+, CD8+, CD56+ and CD19+ cell subsets were studied by flow cytometry. Oligoclonal IgG and IgM bands (OCMB) against lipids were studied by isoelectric focusing and immunoblotting. These data were analysed in relation to clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features. ResultsA CSF NFL cut-off value of 900ng/l (mean+3 SD of NIND values) was calculated. MS patients with increased NFL values showed significantly higher Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score and magnetic resonance imaging lesion number. The presence of OCMB (P<0.0001) and elevated T and B lymphocyte counts was associated with increased levels of CSF NFL. ConclusionsHigh CSF NFL levels are associated with elevated CSF lymphocyte cell counts and intrathecal synthesis of IgM against lipids. These findings support a role for OCMB in the axonal damage of MS offering a rationale for the association of these antibodies with disability and brain atrophy progression in MS. Click to view the accompanying paper in this issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available