4.7 Article

Risk prediction of very early recurrence, death and progression after acute ischaemic stroke

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 599-+

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.12037

Keywords

ABCD2; early recurrence; Essen Stroke Risk Score; ischaemic stroke; RRE-90

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose Early recurrent strokes lead to extended hospitalization and high number of complications. We investigated three stroke scores, the Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS), the ABCD2 and the Recurrence Risk Estimator at 90days (RRE-90) for their prognostic value to predict early recurrent stroke, death and progressive stroke. Methods Clinical and radiological data from 1727 consecutive patients with ischaemic stroke, being admitted to the stroke unit, were evaluated retrospectively. Predictive value of stroke scores was tested for early recurrence within 7days, death and progressive stroke expressed as observational risk and area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC). Results Early recurrent stroke occurred in 56 patients (3.2%), 40 patients (2.3%) died within the first 7days and 125 patients (7.2%) had a progressive stroke. ESRS was not predictive for early recurrence, death or progressive stroke. ABCD2 score was predictive for death (P<0.01; 2; AUROC, 0.65; 0.580.72), and progressive stroke (P<0.001; 2; AUROC, 0.70; 0.660.74). RRE-90 predicted early recurrent stroke (P<0.001; 2; AUROC, 0.65; 0.580.73), early death (P<0.001; 2; AUROC, 0.72; 0.660.78) and progressive stroke (P<0.001; 2; AUROC, 0.66; 0.610.71). Conclusions RRE-90 bears high potential to not only predict early recurrence but also death and progression after ischaemic stroke. ABCD2 appears to be useful to predict risk of death and progression. These findings have relevant clinical implications for early triage of patients being admitted to stroke units.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available