4.7 Review

EFNS guidelines for the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of neurological diseases

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 893-908

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02246.x

Keywords

acute disseminated; encephalomyelitis; Balo's concentric sclerosis; childhood refractory epilepsy; chronic inflammatory; demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; dermatomyositis; Guillain-Barre syndrome; intravenous immunoglobulin; multifocal motor neuropathy; multiple sclerosis; myastenia gravis; neuromyelitis optica; Rasmussen's encephalitis; stiffperson syndrome and post-polio syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is widely used in treatment of a number of immune-mediated neurological diseases, the consensus on its optimal use is insufficient. To define the evidence-based optimal use of IVIG in neurology, the recent papers of high relevance were reviewed and consensus recommendations are given according to EFNS guidance regulations. The efficacy of IVIG has been proven in Guillain-Barre syndrome (level A), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (level A), multifocal mononeuropathy (level A), acute exacerbations of myasthenia gravis (MG) and short-term treatment of severe MG (level A recommendation), and some paraneoplastic neuropathies (level B). IVIG is recommended as a second-line treatment in combination with prednisone in dermatomyositis (level B) and treatment option in polymyositis (level C). IVIG should be considered as a second or third-line therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, if conventional immunomodulatory therapies are not tolerated (level B), and in relapses during pregnancy or post-partum period (good clinical practice point). IVIG seems to have a favourable effect also in paraneoplastic neurological diseases (level A), stiff-person syndrome (level A), some acute-demyelinating diseases and childhood refractory epilepsy (good practice point).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available