4.7 Article

Assessing the chemical diversity of an hsp90 database

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 2000-2009

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.01.048

Keywords

Heat shock protein 90; hsp90 inhibitors; Molecular descriptors; Chemical fragments; Chemical diversity

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. European Union (EU) [MEST-CT-2005-020580]
  3. Region Ile-de-France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 90-kDa heat shock protein (hsp90) has emerged as a new, promising target for cancer drug discovery. With the simultaneous disruption of a large range of oncogenic pathways, hsp90 inhibition results in either cytostasis or cell death. Diverse inhibitors of this molecular chaperone are currently under intensive study, and several have reached clinical trials. In the present work, patented and published structure-activity relationships on hsp90 inhibitors were organised in a database format that associates chemical structures with their biological activities. This hsp90 database contains 814 unique structures and, to our knowledge, is the most complete ever reported. With the aim to provide a general overview and evaluation of the chemical diversity of the ligands included in the dataset, a two-dimensional analysis was performed. A set of twenty-five topological molecular descriptors was calculated, allowing the emphasis of those that have higher importance for hsp90 active compounds, and for the three chemical scaffold families, geldanamycins, purines and pyrazole-isoxazoles. We have used a principal-component analysis (PCA) computational approach to analyse the 2D descriptor space of active and non-active hsp90 ligands. Furthermore, a fragment-based study highlighted the most frequently moieties represented in the active purine and pyrazole-isoxazole derivatives that are likely to be responsible for the observed biological activities. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available