4.1 Article

Negative electron transfer dissociation Fourier transform mass spectrometry of glycosaminoglycan carbohydrates

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 167-176

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1255/ejms.1120

Keywords

glycosaminoglycans; Fourier transform mass spectrometry; electrospray ionization; negative electron detachment dissociation; ion-ion reactions; electron detachment dissociation; heparan sulfate; dermatan sulfate; heparin

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [2R01-GM038060-16]
  2. Center for Research Resource of the National Institutes of Health [P41RR005351]
  3. Dissertation Completion Award
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR005351] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P41GM103390, R01GM038060] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electron transfer through gas-phase ion-ion reactions has led to the widespread application of electron-based techniques once only capable in ion trapping mass spectrometers. Although any mass analyzer can, in theory, be coupled to an ion-ion reaction device (typically a 3-D ion trap), some systems of interest exceed the capabilities of most mass spectrometers. This case is particularly true in the structural characterization of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) oligosaccharides. To adequately characterize highly sulfated GAGs or oligosaccharides above the tetrasaccharide level, a high-resolution mass analyzer is required. To extend previous efforts on an ion trap mass spectrometer, negative electron transfer dissociation coupled with a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer has been applied to increasingly sulfated heparan sulfate and heparin tetrasaccharides as well as a dermatan sulfate octasaccharide. Results similar to those obtained by electron detachment dissociation are observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available