4.6 Article

Long-term effects of intermittent Iloprost infusion on pulmonary arterial pressure in connective tissue disease

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 518-521

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.02.005

Keywords

Intravenous cyclic Iloprost; Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Scleroderma; Raynaud phenomenon; NT-proBNP; 6 Min-Walk Distance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Intravenous periodic Iloprost is proven effective in the treatment of Raynaud phenomenon (RP) related to connective tissue disorder (CTD). It's well known that synthetic prostaglandins are effective drugs for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and that PAH is frequently associated with CTD. Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate in the chronic effect of cyclic intravenous Iloprost on pulmonary arterial pressure. Methods: We studied 17 consecutive patients with CTD (14 systemic sclerosis, 3 mixed CTD) and RP, at the entry and after at least 6 months of treatment of RP with cyclic Iloprost. On both occasions, in all patients we performed transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and we determined NT-proBNP plasma levels, NYHA functional class, 6 Minute-Walk Distance (6MWD). Results: At follow-up (8.2 +/- 1.9 months; range 6-12) mean values of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) significantly decreased (from 32.2 +/- 9.2 to 29.2 +/- 7.6 mmHg, p<0.04) and mean values of 6MWD significantly increased (from 407.5 +/- 101.5 to 448.3 +/- 89.9 m, p<0.01). Moreover, we observed a significant direct correlation between PASP and NT-proBNP values and a significant inverse correlation both between NT-proBNP and 6MWD values and between PASP and 6MWD values. Conclusion: Our results suggest that cyclic intravenous Iloprost may protect against the development or worsening of PAH in patients with CTD and RP. (C) 2011 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available