4.6 Article

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in elderly patients: A study of 47 cases from a single reference center

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 447-451

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.07.006

Keywords

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; Elderly; Age; Corticosteroids; Splenectomy; Danatrol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Idopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is often diagnosed in the elderly, but no specific guidelines exist for such patients. We describe our experience with ITP management in elderly patients and analyze the therapeutic response. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 47 consecutive elderly ITP patients (>= 60 years old) followed in a single reference center. We specifically analyzed the clinical characteristics, therapies used, patient response rates, and side effects. Results: The mean age of the 47 patients was 66 (range 60-82) years; 31 patients were female. Their initial presentation included bleeding limited to the skin (n=10, 21%) and bleeding at one or more other sites (n = 26, 56%); 11 patients (23%) were asymptomatic. The mean platelet count was 52 x 10(9)/L (range 1-120 x 10(9)/L). After 1 and 6 months, the overall response rate was: 61% and 33% with corticosteroids (n=43), 80% and 50% with splenectomy (n=10), and 14% and 60% with danazol (n=15), respectively. Side effects of these therapies were reported in 100% of these elderly ITP patients, 60% and 50% with these drugs, respectively. No response was reported using IVIg. One case of fatal sepsis was noted after splenectomy. Conclusions: The results confirm (1) that age influences the hemorrhagic pattern of ITP expression, response, and adverse effects of conventional ITP therapies, and (2) that danazol has the potential to be an effective therapeutic alternative to splenectomy in elderly ITP patients. (c) 2008 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available