4.5 Article

Longitudinal analysis of 25 sequential sample-pairs using a custom multiple myeloma mutation sequencing panel (M3P)

Journal

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages 1205-1211

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-015-2344-9

Keywords

Multiple myeloma; Targeted sequencing

Categories

Funding

  1. ECOG CA [21115 T]
  2. Predolin Foundation
  3. Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
  4. Mayo Foundation
  5. DFG [Ko 4604/1-1, BU 1339/7-2, BU 1339/3-1, LA 2414/2-1]
  6. Henry Predolin Foundation
  7. Marriott Specialized Workforce Development Awards in Individualized Medicine
  8. Fraternal Order of Eagles
  9. [R01 CA83724]
  10. [CA167511]
  11. [CA183968]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advances in genomic sequencing technologies now allow results from deep next-generation sequencing to be obtained within clinically meaningful timeframes, making this an attractive approach to better guide personalized treatment strategies. No multiple myeloma-specific gene panel has been established so far; we therefore designed a 47-gene-targeting gene panel, containing 39 genes known to be mutated in a parts per thousand yen3 % of multiple myeloma cases and eight genes in pathways therapeutically targeted in multiple myeloma (MM). We performed targeted sequencing on tumor/germline DNA of 25 MM patients in which we also had a sequential sample post treatment. Mutation analysis revealed KRAS as the most commonly mutated gene (36 % in each time point), followed by NRAS (20 and 16 %), TP53 (16 and 16 %), DIS3 (16 and 16 %), FAM46C (12 and 16 %), and SP140 (12 and 12 %). We successfully tracked clonal evolution and identified mutation acquisition and/or loss in FAM46C, FAT1, KRAS, NRAS, SPEN, PRDM1, NEB, and TP53 as well as two mutations in XBP1, a gene associated with bortezomib resistance. Thus, we present the first longitudinal analysis of a MM-specific targeted sequencing gene panel that can be used for individual tumor characterization and for tracking clonal evolution over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available