4.5 Article

Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 295-316

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.23

Keywords

privacy; anonymity; secrecy; confidentiality; control; risk

Funding

  1. PNC Technologies Career Development Professorship
  2. Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award by the National Science Foundation
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [0953749] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Privacy is one of the few concepts that has been studied across many disciplines, but is still difficult to grasp. The current understanding of privacy is largely fragmented and discipline-dependent. This study develops and tests a framework of information privacy and its correlates, the latter often being confused with or built into definitions of information privacy per se. Our framework development was based on the privacy theories of Westin and Altman, the economic view of the privacy calculus, and the identity management framework of Zwick and Dholakia. The dependent variable of the model is perceived information privacy. The particularly relevant correlates to information privacy are anonymity, secrecy, confidentiality, and control. We posit that the first three are tactics for information control; perceived information control and perceived risk are salient determinants of perceived information privacy; and perceived risk is a function of perceived benefits of information disclosure, information sensitivity, importance of information transparency, and regulatory expectations. The research model was empirically tested and validated in the Web 2.0 context, using a survey of Web 2.0 users. Our study enhances the theoretical understanding of information privacy and is useful for privacy advocates, and legal, management information systems, marketing, and social science scholars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available