4.5 Article

Epitope-specific CD4(+), but not CD8(+), T-cell responses induced by recombinant influenza A viruses protect against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 780-793

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201444954

Keywords

CD4(+) Tcells; Interferon-gamma; Lung; Recombinant influenza A virus; Tuberculosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1011027]
  2. NSW Government Infrastructure Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tuberculosis remains a global health problem, in part due to failure of the currently available vaccine, BCG, to protect adults against pulmonary forms of the disease. We explored the impact of pulmonary delivery of recombinant influenza A viruses (rIAVs) on the induction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis)-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses and the resultant protection against M. tuberculosis infection in C57BL/6 mice. Intranasal infection with rIAVs expressing a CD4(+) T-cell epitope from the Ag85B protein (PR8.p25) or CD8(+) T-cell epitope from the TB10.4 protein (PR8.TB10.4) generated strong T-cell responses to the M. tuberculosis-specific epitopes in the lung that persisted long after the rIAVs were cleared. Infection with PR8.p25 conferred protection against subsequent M. tuberculosis challenge in the lung, and this was associated with increased levels of poly-functional CD4(+) Tcells at the time of challenge. By contrast, infection with PR8.TB10.4 did not induce protection despite the presence of IFN--producing M. tuberculosis-specific CD8(+) Tcells in the lung at the time of challenge and during infection. Therefore, the induction of pulmonary M. tuberculosis epitope-specific CD4(+), but not CD8(+) Tcells, is essential for protection against acute M. tuberculosis infection in the lung.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available