4.5 Review

Infectious diseases in humanized mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 2246-2254

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201343815

Keywords

Dengue virus; EBV; HIV; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Salmonella enterica typhi

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA108609]
  2. Sassella Foundation [10/02, 11/02, 12/02]
  3. Cancer Research Switzerland [KFS-02652-08-2010]
  4. Association for International Cancer Research [11-0516]
  5. KFSPMS of the University of Zurich
  6. KFSPHLD of the University of Zurich
  7. Vontobel Foundation
  8. Baugarten Foundation
  9. EMDO Foundation
  10. Sobek Foundation
  11. Fondation Acteria
  12. Novartis
  13. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_143979, CRSII3_136241]
  14. Worldwide Cancer Research [11-0516] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite many theoretical incompatibilities between mouse and human cells, mice with reconstituted human immune system components contain nearly all human leukocyte populations. Accordingly, several human-tropic pathogens have been investigated in these in vivo models of the human immune system, including viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), as well as bacteria such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Salmonella enterica Typhi. While these studies initially aimed to establish similarities in the pathogenesis of infections between these models and the pathobiology in patients, recent investigations have provided new and interesting functional insights into the protective value of certain immune compartments and altered pathology upon mutant pathogen infections. As more tools and methodologies are developed to make these models more versatile to study human immune responses in vivo, such improvements build toward small animal models with human immune components, which could predict immune responses to therapies and vaccination in human patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available