4.5 Article

Tracking antigen-specific CD4+T cells throughout the course of chronic Leishmania major infection in resistant mice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 427-438

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201242715

Keywords

CD4+T cells; IFN-; IL-10; Leishmania major; Tetramer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  2. US National Institutes of Health [R37 AI027998, R01 AI039614, R01 AI066016, T32 AI07313, T32 CA9138]
  3. Minnesota Medical Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary Leishmania major infection typically produces cutaneous lesions that not only heal but also harbor persistent parasites. While the opposing roles of CD4+ T-cell-derived IFN- and IL-10 in promoting parasite killing and persistence have been well established, how these responses develop from naive precursors has not been directly monitored throughout the course of infection. We used peptide:Major Histocompatibility Complex class II (pMHCII) tetramers to investigate the endogenous, parasite-specific primary CD4+ T-cell response to L. major in mice resistant to infection. Maximal frequencies of IFN-+ CD4+ T cells were observed in the spleen and infected ears within a month after infection and were maintained into the chronic phase. In contrast, peak frequencies of IL-10+ CD4+ T cells emerged within 2 weeks of infection, persisted into the chronic phase, and accumulated in the infected ears but not the spleen, via a process that depended on local antigen presentation. T helper type-1 (Th1) cells, not Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, were the chief producers of IL-10 and were not exhausted. Therefore, tracking antigen-specific CD4+ T cells revealed that IL-10 production by Th1 cells is not due to persistent T-cell antigen receptor stimulation, but rather driven by early antigen encounter at the site of infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available