4.5 Article

Antigen amount dictates CD8+ T-cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection irrespective of the type of antigen presenting cell

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 2290-2304

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201142275

Keywords

Antigen amount; CD8+T cell; Chronic viral infection; Dysfunction; Immunopathology

Categories

Funding

  1. ETH Zurich
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030-129751]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_129751] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic viral infections lead to CD8+ T-cell exhaustion, characterized by impaired cytokine secretion and loss of proliferative capacity. While viral load and T-cell dysfunction correlate, it is currently unclear whether the quality of a cell type presenting antigen determines the degree of T-cell exhaustion or if the overall amount of antigen recognized by T cells promotes exhaustion. We found that chronic lymphocytic chorio-meningitis virus infection led to decreased CD8+ T-cell exhaustion in DC-MHC class I (MHCI) mice, in which CD8+ T cells can only recognize antigen on DCs. However, this increase in CD8+ T-cell function came at the expense of fatal immunopathology. Additional antigen recognition on nonhematopoietic cells in DC-MHCI mice promoted T-cell exhaustion and avoidance of immunopathology. Likewise, increased numbers of antigen-expressing hematopoietic cells, as well as a selective elevation of the number of DCs as the only cell type presenting antigen in DC-MHCI mice, resulted in compromised T-cell function. These results favor a scenario in which the overall amount of antigen exposure, rather than the type of cell engaging with virus-specific CD8+ T cells, is responsible for their functional exhaustion. Furthermore, exhaustion of virus-specific CD8+ T cells leads to avoidance of life-threatening immunopathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available