4.5 Article

ATP conditions intestinal epithelial cells to an inflammatory state that promotes components of DC maturation

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 3310-3321

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201142213

Keywords

CD4 T cells; Dendritic cells; Immune regulation; Intestinal immunity; Toll-like receptors

Categories

Funding

  1. New Emerging Team grant in Autoimmunity from the CIHR [III 84037 93793]
  2. CIHR Doctoral Research Award
  3. CIHR Transplant Training Award
  4. UBC Affiliated Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) normally promote the development of gut resident tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs) and regulatory T cells, but how this process is altered in inflammatory bowel disease is not well characterized. Recently, we published that the cell injury signal ATP modulates IEC chemokine responses to the TLR5 ligand flagellin and exacerbates colitis in the presence of flagellin. We hypothesized that ATP switches these IECs from tolerogenic to proinflammatory, enhancing DC activation and immune responses to commensal antigens. Here, we report that ATP enhanced murine IEC production of KC, IL-6, TGF-beta, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin in response to TLR1/2 stimulation by Pam3CSK4 (PAM). Moreover, supernatants from IECs stimulated with ATP+PAM enhanced expression of CD80 on bone marrow derived dendritic cells, and increased their production of IL-12, IL-6, IL-23, TGF-beta, and aldh1a2, suggesting a Th1/Th17 polarizing environment. DCs conditioned by stressed IECs stimulated an enhanced recall response to flagellin and supported the expansion of IFN-?+ and IL-17+ memory T cells. Lastly, colonic administration of nonhydrolysable ATP increased production of IL-6 and Cxcl1 (KC) by IECs. These findings indicate that ATP influences the response of IECs to TLR ligands and biases the maturation of DCs to become inflammatory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available