4.5 Review

How B cells shape the immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 676-686

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200839148

Keywords

B cells; Fc gamma receptors; Humoral; Mycobacteria; Tuberculosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL071241, R01 A150732, P01 A1063537]
  2. Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center [P30 AI051519, T32 AI007506]
  3. American Medical Association Foundation
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL071241] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI050732, T32AI007506, P30AI051519, P01AI063537] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive work illustrating the importance of cellular immune mechanisms for protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis has largely relegated B-cell biology to an afterthought within the tuberculosis (TB) field. However, recent studies have illustrated that B lymphocytes, through a variety of interactions with the cellular immune response, play previously underappreciated roles in shaping host defense against non-viral intracellular pathogens, including M. tuberculosis. Work in our laboratory has recently shown that, by considering these lymphocytes more broadly within their variety of interactions with cellular immunity, B cells have a significant impact on the outcome of airborne challenge with M. tuberculosis as well as the resultant inflammatory response. in this review, we advocate for a revised view of TB immunology in which roles of cellular and humoral immunity are not mutually exclusive. In the context of our current understanding of host defense against non-viral intracellular infections, we review recent data supporting a more significant role of B cells during M. tuberculosis infection than previously thought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available