4.5 Article

Heterozygous LHX3 mutations may lead to a mild phenotype of combined pituitary hormone deficiency

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 216-225

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0264-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Endocrine Society
  2. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LHX3 is an LIM domain transcription factor involved in the early steps of pituitary ontogenesis. We report here functional ;studies of three allelic variants, including the first heterozygous variant of LHX3 NM_178138.5(LHX3):c.587T>C (p. (Leu196Pro)) that may be responsible for a milder phenotype of hypopituitarism. Our functional studies showed that NM_178138.5(LHX3):c.587T>C (p.(Leu196Pro)) was not able to activate target promoters in vitro, as it did not bind DNA, and likely affected LHX3 function via a mechanism of haplo-insufficiency. Our study demonstrates the possibility that patients with a heterozygous variant of LHX3 may have pituitary deficiencies, with a milder phenotype than patients with homozygous variants. It is thus of vital to propose an optimal follow-up of such patients, who, until now, were considered as not being at risk of presenting pituitary deficiency. The second variant NM_178138.5(LHX3):c.622C>G (p.(Arg208Gly)), present in a homozygous state, displayed decreased transactivating ability without loss of binding capacity in vitro, concordant with in silico analysis; it should thus be considered to affect LHX3 function. In contrast, the NM_178138.5 (LHX3):c.929G>C (p.(Arg310Pro)) variant, in a heterozygous state, also predicted as deleterious in silico, proved functionally active in vitro, and should thus still be classified as a variant of unknown significance. Our study emphasizes the need for functional studies due to the limits of software-based predictions of new variants, and the possible association of a pituitary phenotype to heterozygous LHX3 variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available