4.5 Article

Dietary anaplerotic therapy improves peripheral tissue energy metabolism in patients with Huntington's disease

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages 1057-1060

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.72

Keywords

Huntington's disease; clinical trial; triheptanoin; Krebs cycle; magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously identified a systemic metabolic defect associated with early weight loss in patients with Huntington's disease (HD), suggesting a lack of substrates for the Krebs cycle. Dietary anaplerotic therapy with triheptanoin is used in clinical trials to promote energy production in patients with peripheral and brain Krebs cycle deficit, as its metabolites - C5 ketone bodies - cross the blood-brain barrier. We conducted a short-term clinical trial in six HD patients (UHDRS (Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale)=33 +/- 13, 15-49) to monitor the tolerability of triheptanoin. We also assessed peripheral markers of short-term efficacy that were shown to be altered in the early stages of HD, that is, low serum IGF1 and (31)P-NMR spectroscopy (NMRS) in muscle. At baseline, (31)P-NMRS displayed two patients with end-exercise muscle acidosis despite a low work output. On day 2, the introduction of triheptanoin was well tolerated in all patients, and in particular, there was no evidence of mitochondrial overload from triheptanoin-derived metabolites. After 4 days of triheptanoin-enriched diet, muscle pH regulation was normalized in the two patients with pretreatment metabolic abnormalities. A significant increase in serum IGF1 was also observed in all patients (205 +/- 60 ng/ml versus 246 +/- 68 ng/ml, P=0.010). This study provides a rationale for extending our anaplerotic approach with triheptanoin in HD. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 1057-1060; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.72; published online 26 May 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available