4.5 Review

Genetic male infertility and mutation of CATSPER ion channels

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1178-1184

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.108

Keywords

CatSper; male infertility; sperm motility; contraception

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 DC03544, RO1 DC02842, RO1 DK074409]
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A clinically significant proportion of couples experience difficulty in conceiving a child. In about half of these cases male infertility is the cause and often genetic factors are involved. Despite advances in clinical diagnostics similar to 50% of male infertility cases remain idiopathic. Based on this, further analysis of infertile males is required to identify new genetic factors involved in male infertility. This review focuses on cation channel of sperm (CATSPER)-related male infertility. It is based on PubMed literature searches using the keywords 'CATSPER', 'male infertility', 'male contraception', 'immunocontraception' and 'pharmacologic contraception' (publication dates from January 1979 to December 2009). Previously, contiguous gene deletions including the CATSPER2 gene implicated the sperm-specific CATSPER channel in syndromic male infertility (SMI). Recently, we identified insertion mutations of the CATSPER1 gene in families with recessively inherited nonsyndromic male infertility (NSMI). The CATSPER channel therefore represents a novel human male fertility factor. In this review we summarize the genetic and clinical data showing the role of CATSPER mutation in human forms of NSMI and SMI. In addition, we discuss clinical management and therapeutic options for these patients. Finally, we describe how the CATSPER channel could be used as a target for development of a male contraceptive. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 1178-1184; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.108; published online 21 July 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available