4.5 Article

Extended extraocular phenotype of PROM1 mutation in kindreds with known autosomal dominant macular dystrophy

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 131-137

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.147

Keywords

PROM1; CD133; endothelial; tubule; sella turcica

Funding

  1. Big Lottery Fund
  2. Wolfson Trust
  3. National Society for Epilepsy
  4. Biomedical Research Centres at UCLH/UCL
  5. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children/UCL Institute of Child Health
  6. Moorfields Eye Hospital/UCL Institute of Ophthamology
  7. Department of Health, NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  8. British Heart Foundation
  9. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10157] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in prominin 1 (PROM1) have been shown to result in retinitis pigmentosa, macular degeneration and cone-rod dystrophy. Because of the putative role of PROM1 in hippocampal neurogenesis, we examined two kindreds with the same R373C PROM1 missense mutation using our established paradigm to study brain structure and function. As the protein encoded by PROM1, known as CD133, is used to identify stem/progenitor cells that can be found in peripheral blood and reflect endothelial reparatory mechanisms, other parameters were subsequently examined that included measures of vascular function, endothelial function and angiogenic capacity. We found that aspects of endothelial function assayed ex vivo were abnormal in patients with the R373C PROM1 mutation, with impaired adhesion capacity and higher levels of cellular damage. We also noted renal infections, haematuria and recurrent miscarriages possibly reflecting consequences of abnormal tubular modelling. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. European Journal of Human Genetics (2011) 19, 131-137; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2010.147; published online 22 September 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available