4.5 Article

A gene-based method for detecting gene-gene co-association in a case-control association study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 582-587

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.223

Keywords

gene-based; gene-gene co-association; canonical correlation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871392]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Association study (especially the genome-wide association study) now has a key function in identification and characterization of disease-predisposing genetic variant(s), which customarily involve multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a candidate region or across the genome. Case-control association design remains the most popular and a challenging issue in the statistical analysis is the optimal use of all information contained in these SNPs. Previous approaches often treated gene-gene interaction as deviation from additive genetic effects or replaced it with SNP-SNP interaction. However, these approaches are limited for their failure of consideration of gene-gene interaction or gene-gene co-association at gene level. Although the co-association of the SNPs within a candidate gene can be detected by principal component analysis-based logistic regression model, the detection of co-association between genes in genome remains uncertain. Here, we proposed a canonical correlation-based U statistic (CCU) for detecting gene-based gene-gene co-association in the case-control design. We explored its type I error rates and power through simulation and analyzed two real data sets. By treating gene as a functional unit in analysis, we found that CCU was a strong alternative to previous approaches. We discussed the performance of CCU as a gene-based gene-gene co-association statistic and the prospect of further improvement. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 582-587; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.223; published online 23 December 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available