4.5 Article

High-resolution SNP arrays in mental retardation diagnostics: how much do we gain?

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 178-185

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.154

Keywords

mental retardation; pathogenic CNVs; SNP array; GeneChip 6.0

Funding

  1. PA Department of Health [SAP4100026302]
  2. NIH [HL-69256]
  3. Cardeza Foundation for Hematological Research (Philadelphia, PA)
  4. Kimmel Cancer Center (Philadelphia, PA)
  5. Italian NIH [526D/28]
  6. Italian Ministry of Health [RC2008-2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used Affymetrix 6.0 GeneChip SNP arrays to characterize copy number variations (CNVs) in a cohort of 70 patients previously characterized on lower-density oligonucleotide arrays affected by idiopathic mental retardation and dysmorphic features. The SNP array platform includes similar to 900 000 SNP probes and 900 000 non-SNP oligonucleotide probes at an average distance of 0.7 Kb, which facilitates coverage of the whole genome, including coding and noncoding regions. The high density of probes is critical for detecting small CNVs, but it can lead to data interpretation problems. To reduce the number of false positives, parameters were set to consider only imbalances 475 Kb encompassing at least 80 probe sets. The higher resolution of the SNP array platform confirmed the increased ability to detect small CNVs, although more than 80% of these CNVs overlapped to copy number 'neutral' polymorphism regions and 4.4% of them did not contain known genes. In our cohort of 70 patients, of the 51 previously evaluated as 'normal' on the Agilent 44K array, the SNP array platform disclosed six additional CNV changes, including three in three patients, which may be pathogenic. This suggests that about 6% of individuals classified as 'normal' using the lower-density oligonucleotide array could be found to be affected by a genomic disorder when evaluated with the higher-density microarray platforms. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 178-185; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.154; published online 7 October 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available