4.5 Article

Impact of concomitant heart failure on outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: analysis of the Melbourne Interventional Group registry

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 416-422

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr003

Keywords

Heart failure; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Mortality

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Abbot Vascular
  3. Astra-Zeneca
  4. Biotronik
  5. Boston-Scientific
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. CSL
  8. Johnson Johnson
  9. Medtronic
  10. Pfizer
  11. Schering-Plough
  12. Sanofi-Aventis
  13. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The presence of heart failure (HF) is an established risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and impact of concomitant HF on major outcomes in contemporary PCI practice. Methods and results We analysed 5006 consecutive PCIs (2004-2006) enrolled in the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes of patients with a history of HF (n = 189, 3.8%) were compared with patients without HF (n = 4817, 96.2%). Patients with a history of HF were older (mean age 72.9 +/- 9.8 vs. 64.3 +/- 12 years, P < 0.01) and had higher rates of diabetes (37.0 vs. 23.5%, P < 0.01), renal dysfunction (Cr > 200 mu mol/L; 16.5 vs. 3.9%, P < 0.01), multi-vessel disease (79.8 vs. 58.7%, P < 0.01), and presentation with cardiogenic shock (4.8 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.02). At 12 months, patients with HF had higher overall mortality (13.7 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.01) and rates of HF admission (10.4 vs. 2.0%, P < 0.01). Independent predictors of recurrent HF admission included history of HF [odds ratio (OR) 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.2, P < 0.01] and renal dysfunction (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4, P < 0.01). At 12 months, patients with HF had lower rates of statin (73.9 vs. 89.2%, P < 0.01) and beta-blocker use (55.6 vs. 59.0%, P < 0.01). Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use was also relatively low in HF patients (79.6%). Conclusion While the overall incidence of HF in patients undergoing PCI is low, underutilization of HF therapies may contribute to an increased likelihood of subsequent re-admission and increased mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available