4.5 Article

Impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure: an updated, post-TREAT meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 936-942

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq094

Keywords

Heart failure; Erythropoiesis-stimulating protein; Anaemia; Erythropoietin; Darbepoetin; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Intel
  2. Relypsa
  3. Biogen-Idec
  4. AtCor Medical, Inc.
  5. Amgen
  6. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  7. Menarini
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Roche
  10. Novocardia
  11. Boehringer Ingelheim
  12. Novartis
  13. BioMerieux
  14. Boston Scientific
  15. AstraZeneca
  16. Solvay
  17. Takeda
  18. BMS Sanofi
  19. Vox Media
  20. BMS
  21. Cytokinetics
  22. Hoffmann-La Roche
  23. Pfizer
  24. Scios
  25. GlaxoSmithKline
  26. Abbott
  27. Biogen
  28. Centocor
  29. CVRx
  30. Genentech
  31. Daiichi Sankyo
  32. Genzyme
  33. Medtronic
  34. Sanofi-Aventis
  35. Servier
  36. VIA Pharmaceutics
  37. Baxter
  38. Celladon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Randomized clinical trials have suggested that treatment of anaemia with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with cancer or chronic kidney disease may increase cardiovascular risk. We therefore examined the effect of treating anaemia with an ESA in patients with heart failure in a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, including the recently reported TREAT study. Methods and results We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all prospective, randomized, controlled studies of ESAs enrolling patients with heart failure and reporting data on mortality or non-fatal heart failure events. Of 10 trials initially identified by our search strategy, we pooled data from 9 placebo-controlled studies enrolling a total of 2039 patients, of whom 1023 (50.2%) were allocated to ESA treatment. The pooled risk ratio for ESA treatment relative to placebo was 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-1.21, P = 0.68] for overall mortality and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.82-1.10, P = 0.46) for worsening heart failure. Conclusions The use of ESAs to manage anaemia in patients with heart failure was associated with a neutral effect on both mortality and non-fatal heart failure events. Definitive assessment of the balance of risk and benefit in this population awaits the completion of a randomized clinical trial adequately powered to assess clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available