4.5 Article

Relations of serum phosphorus levels to echocardiographic left ventricular mass and incidence of heart failure in the community

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 812-818

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq106

Keywords

Phosphorus; Congestive heart failure; Ventricle; Epidemiology; Risk factors

Funding

  1. NIH/NHLBI [N01-HC-25195, HL080124, 2K24HL4334]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To evaluate the association of serum phosphorus with cardiac structure/function and incident heart failure. Methods and results We related serum phosphorus to echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) measurements cross-sectionally, and to incident heart failure prospectively in 3300 participants (mean age 44 years, 51% women) free of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Cross-sectionally, serum phosphorus was related positively to LV mass, internal dimensions, and systolic dysfunction. On follow-up (mean 17.4 years), 157 individuals developed heart failure. In models adjusting for established risk factors as time-varying covariates, each mg/dL increment in serum phosphorus was associated with a 1.74-fold risk of heart failure [95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.17-2.59]. Individuals in the highest serum phosphorus quartile experienced a two-fold (95% CI 1.28-3.40) risk of heart failure compared with participants in the lowest quartile. These relations were maintained upon additional adjustment for LV mass/dimensions and systolic dysfunction. In analyses restricted to individuals with eGFR >90 mUmin/1.73 m(2), no proteinuria and serum phosphorus <4.5 mg/dL, the association of serum phosphorus with heart failure remained robust. Conclusion In our community-based sample, higher serum phosphorus was associated with greater LV mass cross-sectionally, and with an increased risk of heart failure prospectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available