4.5 Article

High Infiltration of Tumor-Associated Macrophages is Associated With a Poor Response to Chemotherapy and Poor Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages 752-759

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23881

Keywords

macrophage; esophageal cancer; chemotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objectiveTumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are well known to have distinct roles in tumor progression and metastasis. However, the role of TAMs in chemoresistance has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study is to examine whether TAMs, especially M2 macrophages, are associated with the tumor response to chemotherapy with esophageal cancers. MethodsUsing 210 tissues from patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgery, we calculated the number of intratumoral CD68(+) macrophages, CD163(+) macrophages, and CD8(+) lymphocytes using immunohistochemistry. CD68 and CD163 were used as markers for whole macrophages and M2 macrophages, respectively. ResultsInfiltration of CD68(+) macrophages and CD163(+) macrophages was significantly associated with tumor depth, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. High infiltration of CD68(+) macrophages and CD163(+) macrophages was significantly associated with poor prognosis for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding the response to chemotherapy, high infiltration of CD68(+) and CD163(+) macrophages had a significant association with poor response to chemotherapy, both clinically and pathologically (P<0.001, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that infiltration of CD163(+) macrophages was an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ConclusionsInfiltration of TAMs, especially M2 macrophages, is associated with a poor response to chemotherapy and poor prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:752-759. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available