4.5 Article

Years-needed-to-treat to add 1 year of life: a new metric to estimate treatment effects in randomized trials

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 256-263

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfn048

Keywords

Heart failure; Prognostication; Outcomes; Epidemiology; Gompertz; Beta-blocker; Number-needed-to-treat; Years-needed-to-treat

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims A standard metric to estimate absolute treatment effects is numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT), which implicitly assumes that all benefits reverse at trial-end. However, in-trial survival benefits typically do not reverse until long after trial-end, so that NNT will substantially underestimate lifetime benefits. Methods and results We developed a new concept, years-needed-to-treat (YNT) to add 1 year of life, that quantifies the expected average life expectancy for two treatments including the estimated years of life remaining post-trial. Numbers-needed-to-treat and YNT were calculated in the COMET trial, in which carvedilol vs. metoprolol tartrate resulted in 17% lower mortality over 4.8 years. A multivariate Cox model was used to predict survival. Remaining years of life were estimated using the mortality-life-table method. At trial-end, survival was 9% higher in the carvedilol arm. Assuming that patients remained on the same therapy post-trial, the average total years of life for carvedilol vs. metoprolol were 10.63 +/- 0.19 vs. 9.48 +/- 0.18 (P < 0.0001) or 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.64-1.66) additional years of life. The YNT was 9.2, indicating that 9.2 person-years of treatment added 1 person-year of life, compared with NNT of 59. Conclusion Compared with NNT, the YNT method more accurately accounts for potential long-term benefits of interventions in randomized trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available