4.5 Article

Effect of atrial fibrillation on long-term survival in patients hospitalised for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 566-572

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.04.002

Keywords

heart failure; atrial fibrillation; ejection fraction; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Backgroun: The prognostic importance of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) is not clearly established. Studies conducted in systolic HF have led to discordant results. Aims: To evaluate the relation between AF and long-terin survival in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (fIFPEF). Methods and results: We prospectively included 368 consecutive patients hospitalised for a first episode of HFPEF during 2000 and compared the 5-year outcome of patients according to the presence or absence of AF on the baseline electrocardiogram. Propensity scores were used to reduce imbalance in baseline characteristics. Baseline AF was observed in 3 6% (n = 132) of the study population. Patients with AF were older and more often had hypertensive heart disease. On univariate analysis, baseline AF was associated with an increased risk of 5-year overall mortality (HR= 1.36; 95%CI 1.03-1.79; p=0.03). After adjustment for covariates, baseline AF was no longer a predictor of reduced survival. The risk of adjusted cardiovascular death in patients with and without AF was comparable. In the propensity-matched patients, AT was not related to a poorer outcome (HR= 1.08; 95%CI 0.78-1.51; p=0.63). Conclusion: In patients hospitalised for HFPEF, AF is frequent and associated with an excess mortality mainly related to the advanced age of these patients. After adjustment for covariates, baseline AF is not an independent predictor of long-term mortality. (c) 2008 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available